“Mirrored”

For the “argument” where they tell me what sexuality i am, which is for me to be who i am, do they say theyre me and im them, then?

And i think the “argument” is that im the devil casting myself as an angel of light by making them pick on me? Again, they get themselves and me confused. They are picking on me

It only adds to the “argument” against themselves. They dont recognise their own reflection

That to make some allegation thats not me, beastialitybisexualitypaedophillia, therefore must come from them

A trial that puts themselves on trial, both defendent and prosecution. Is that even, by definition, an “argument”?

Then the accusation becomes that their own trial, makes me the devil cause im them?

For, can anyone “see” the devil, except those who call on them? Who, looking in a mirror, dont see their own reflection. They see, instead, the devil looking back at them